Construction Notes
The inspiration for this homebrew project
came from the The ARRL
Antenna Book, the 1997 Edition. The article was entitled "A
Portable 144-Mhz 4-Element Quad," pages 18-30. This looked like a
great antenna design, and as it turned out, I needed an indoor attic
antenna but only had limited space for the beam rotation. So the relative
compactness of this design (four elements) caught my eye.
NOTE: The above article does an excellent job of describing the
suggested parts and methods of assembly, so I won't try to summarize,
but rather will point out where my approach differed.
- Electrical Parameters:
-
Just in case you can't get a copy of this
article, here are some of the
electrical specifications for the wire lengths: the reflector,
the driver, and the two directors. Three formulas specify these lengths
in feet:
- reflector = 1046.8 / f MHz
- driver = 985.5 / f MHz
- director(s) = 973.3 / f MHz
My spacings are
|ref-------17"------|drv------13"-----|dir1-----11"-----|dir2
It tunes up quite well on 146 with an impedance of 50 Ohms. (Note: the
antenna is transmitting to the right with the reflector on the left and the
two directors facing to the right.)
It is recommended that you tune the driver to
146 Mhz since it is fairly broad in its bandwidth about 2 Mhz at the 1.5
SWR points. The article also suggests that you space the elements between
0.14 and 0.25 lambda. It does not give any hard and fast distances for
these spacings. That is one reason I made the elements adjustable
along the boom! You may have to experiment and test with an SWR meter to
determine your best spacings and impedances. It took me a while to get the
tuning right on this antenna, delving into other books on quad design,
but I did finally get it right onto resonance!
|
|
Additional Working Notes:
What is the point of this "adjusting?" If you have
been working with antennas for a while, you know that the length of the
driver element is what determines the center resonant frequency. Changing
this length is the only way to "tune" the antenna. The design, as it
stands, is not tuneable after the wire has been cut. So when we move the
elements on the beam, what are we changing? Two parameters:
1. The Feedpoint Impedance
2. The RF Gain of the Antenna
and, the resonant frequency remains uneffected unless we add a tuning
or matching device or re-cut the driver. It's quite evident why more
gain is always a sought-after commodity, but why "fiddle with" the
impedance?
Well, as we know, the right impedance match does effect the rf output since
a "bad" match means heavy losses in the feedline. Any gains in the antenna
could be offset by those feedline losses. Or, suppose you want
to feed the loop with 75 Ohm line or something unusual. Then you can keep
adjusting the element spacing to obtain the best SWR on your meter.
(You might even be able to find a match for 300 Ohm low-loss TV line!
Lower impedances are more likely though...)
As you work with this antenna, it becomes clear that there is a relationship
between the right impedance match and gain. When the impedance "locks in,"
i.e., your lowest SWR reading, you are usually at maximum gain...
|
- reflector = 1071 / f MHz
- driver = 998 / f MHz
- director(s) = 973 / f MHz
NOTE: I have not constructed this antenna! This informative article
was published in QST Magazine, the January 1995 Edition.
It was entitled "A Five-Element Quad for 2 Meters"
pages 67-69, written by Jim Reynante KD6GLF, and seemed to be a very
good design with amazing results! It may offer some added insights
when buiding your own VHF quad, no matter how many elements you
decide on.
Comments: Each subsequent director after the first one is 3%
shorter in total wire length than the previous one. The "fixed" spacings,
as specified in the article, are:
|ref-----17"----|drv-----13"----|dir1----16"----|dir2----19"----|dir3
(If you employ the adjustable "joist-boom" approach as described here, there
is no reason why this 5-element antenna should not work just as well as the
4-element one; and you will have the added fexibility of adjusting the
feedpoint impedance right where you want it, as well as having a high gain
antenna that is actually very portable!)
- The Support System:
-
Two requirements became evident when designing this antenna:
- Variable Tuning (Impedance & Gain)
- Compact Size
I wanted to move
the elements relative to the beam! This would permit a kind of "tuning in
place" while keeping the beam fixed above its rotation point in a very
limited space. This led to the idea of sliding the elements on two
"joists," which could act like a clamp, until the best tuning position was
found. Also, the entire set of elements should be able to be moved forward
or backward to allow for rotational clearance.
|
Pedestal mount supports beam "joists"
clamped by a center wing nut
|
|
The "pedestal" mount seen here to the left,
where the vertical support intersects the joists, also allows for
some adjustment of the placement of the entire joist assembly. This
pedestal, or mount assembly, sits on top of the vertical pole support
which is attached to the rotator motor at its base. At the top of the
mount, there is a small "stud," sticking up about an inch and
a half, that fits between the joists from the underneath side. The beam's
position can be adjusted via several holes along its joists and then
bolted into place. (In this illustration, there is only one
other hole to the left of the center, bolted hole.) And, I used
diamond-shaped elements instead of the square shape since the horizontal
dowels could also rest on the joists adding more support to the elements.
|
Close-up of the block/slider
showing its connections to the dowels
which form the struts for the wire support system
|
|
Small blocks fasten the dowels where they cross and
form "sliders" that the joists can clamp onto. The close-up photo on the
right shows one possible solution to this problem of affixing a rectilinear
shape to a circular shape. In this example, I drilled through the
block/slider the long way to hold the vertical dowel in place (with wood
glue.) It was a tight fit, and there is a flathead nail visible near the back
that "pinned" the dowel in place while it was gluing. The horizonal cross
piece sits in a groove with a depth of about half the diameter of the
dowel and is also held by a nail, offering both stability during gluing
and a little extra grip to keep the dowel secure. This is just one approach
to the problem. I also tried making a block using only grooves to avoid
excessive weakening of the material, and again lots of waterproof glue. (A
typical size for this block is about 2 inches long by 5/8 of an inch
thick, and about 1 inch for the bearing surface. Use whatever you think is
going to be appropriate for your strut strength. If you were scaling this
design up to, say for example, a 6m antenna, then much larger blocks
would be needed...)
In addition, the antenna wire itself helps to stiffen the dowels making
the strut elements more rigid. Here is an overview of the entire
antenna in the illustration below...
A Side View of the Adjustable Quad Antenna
|
|
|
Note: The antenna's transmit direction is to the left...
|
Once I had approximated the locations of the elements, I used three (3)
bolts to clamp the joists together. You need to drill holes about
every foot or so, to get the right pressure on the blocks/sliders. Sometimes you
have to drill a "special" hole if it conficts with an element spacing
block...
You may build this antenna "support system" out of any size wood dimensions
that you like, or that is convenient, i.e., material you have laying about.
I used two pieces of strapping for the joists about 4 feet long. The wooden
dowels are 3/8 inch diameter. Again, you may choose to make it much more
rugged. I also did not weatherproof the structure since it was intended for indoor
use. The "mounting blocks" were cut from the strapping stock. The vertical
pole was either closet rail or a broom handle. This is really improvizing!
- Final Touches:
-
If you intend to use this antenna outside, and once you have it tuned up to
your satisfaction, you should drill the mounting blocks and bolt them in
place. You may leave the other bolts in as well since this will add
stability under wind loading and rotational torquing. And be sure to
weatherproof it completely since wood ages quickly when exposed to
the elements.
And a closing observation. I just happened
to use wood because it was handy and easy for me to work with; but
selecting appropriate materials, such as light hard woods, plastics, or
aluminum fixtures, or experimenting with new non-conductiong materials,
could produce a very light-weight, rugged quad that would be a great
antenna to add to your "farm," or one that would make a great portable
emergency unit, which could be broken down and re-assembled very
quickly...
(Courtesy KBNorton Computer Systems)
|